🔍 Read the full analysis: Indonesia’s AI Copyright Bill Opens A New Front In Big Tech’s Debate on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok objected to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11. The draft would address payments for news links and previews, as well as AI training, disclosure and creator rights, but it is still under discussion and its current text is not publicly confirmed.
Google, Meta and TikTok pushed back against Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, contesting provisions that could require payments for displaying news and set conditions for using copyrighted material in AI systems. The bill is still being deliberated by lawmakers and the government; it has not become law.
The proposal revises Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as a legislative initiative on March 12, 2026, and it is now being considered by the parliamentary Legislation Body, known as Baleg, together with the government. The Nov. 11 hearing included Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas.
The draft would address payments when platforms aggregate, republish or display news, including through link previews. It would also set rules for AI-assisted and AI-generated work, disclosure of AI use, imitation of a creator’s style, and the use of copyrighted material to train models. The July draft described by Reuters proposed licensing or fair-use provisions for training and sanctions for noncompliance, but the text has since changed and is not final.
Google argued that a payment requirement for links and snippets could lead it to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. Meta said linking is not the same as republishing and warned that payment duties could reduce publisher traffic and revenue. TikTok opposed disclosure requirements when AI merely assists in making content and, like Google, called for intermediary safe-harbor protections. These are company positions, not findings established by lawmakers.
Indonesia’s AI copyright bill opens a new front
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged proposed rules on news payments and AI copyright at a parliamentary hearing. The bill remains under discussion, and its current wording is unconfirmed.
Two disputes in one bill
The proposal would address both platform use of news and copyright rules for AI.
Payments for news links
Reported drafts cover news aggregation, republication and display, including link previews. The current payment terms are unclear.
Training and creator rights
Reported provisions address training on copyrighted work, AI disclosure, style imitation and protection for AI-assisted work.
Stakeholders disagree on link payments
Companies’ claims at the hearing are arguments, not findings established by lawmakers.
- Google warned it could stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.
- Meta said payment duties could reduce publisher traffic and revenue.
- It told lawmakers platforms take 80% of digital advertising.
- It said platform referrals to news sites had fallen by up to 70%.
- The supplied material gives no measurement period or independent verification.
AI rules remain unsettled
An earlier July draft described by Reuters is not the confirmed text now under discussion.
Licensing or exceptions could shape what copyrighted material developers can use.
The earlier draft linked protection for AI-assisted work to human involvement but did not define the threshold.
The proposal addresses AI-use disclosure, but its current requirements are not confirmed.
What happens next
The parliamentary Legislation Body, Baleg, and the government are still examining the revision.
Pressure on News Links and AI Training
The bill puts two contested questions into the same legislative debate: whether platforms should compensate publishers when they display or direct users to news, and how copyright applies when AI models are trained on protected material. A final law could affect publishers’ licensing income, platforms’ access to local reporting, and the material available to developers building AI products for Indonesian users.
The hearing also showed a divide over the likely effects of link payments. Google warned that it might withdraw news indexing and distribution; Meta said publishers could lose traffic. The Press Council offered a different account, telling lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent. Those figures were presented by the council; the supplied source material does not give a measurement period or independent verification.
For AI developers and creators, the details matter as much as the bill’s broad aims. Licensing, exceptions for text and data mining, rules for human contribution and disclosure duties can determine what training data is usable and what protection a creator receives. Until lawmakers settle those provisions, the bill signals a policy direction rather than a settled operating rule.
Products Worth Considering
Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 Portable Power Station with Two 200W Solar Panels
Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition 32GB E-Reader, 7-Inch Display, Seaglass Green
Bose TV Speaker (2nd Gen) Compact Soundbar with Bluetooth and HDMI Connectivity, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From 2014 Copyright Law to AI Rules
The proposal updates a copyright statute adopted in 2014 to address new disputes over online news distribution and generative AI. In July 2026, Reuters reported on an earlier draft that would recognize AI-related work in the law, restrict imitation of a creator’s distinctive style and require disclosure of AI use. The draft would protect AI-assisted works only when they met a human-involvement threshold, while excluding fully AI-generated works. It did not specify how much human contribution would qualify.
In July, law ministry official Hermansyah Siregar described the draft as an early explicit recognition of AI in Indonesian copyright law and said generative AI had disrupted the copyright framework. He also stressed that the text was not final. The bill follows Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. Press Council deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that compliance with that regulation was low and it had not worked as intended, according to Aktual.
The Nov. 11 hearing is a stage in parliamentary deliberation, not a final vote. Reports from Indonesian outlets and Reuters describe draft provisions and competing positions, but the full text now under discussion was not available in the source material. References to article numbers in reporting should be treated as provisional because versions differ.
“A levy on links would leave Google with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative, as reported by Reuters
Key Draft Terms Still Unsettled
The current draft text is not available in the supplied reporting, and the July version has changed. It is therefore unclear exactly which provisions lawmakers are considering now, how the proposed news-payment system would calculate compensation, or how any money would be allocated among publishers and other rights holders.
The human contribution needed for copyright protection of AI-assisted work, the scope of any training-data exception or licensing duty, and the meaning of disclosure requirements also remain unresolved. The reported positions of Google, Meta and TikTok are arguments made at the hearing; the source material does not establish whether lawmakers will adopt or reject them. No vote date is reported.
Deliberations Continue in Baleg
The parliamentary Legislation Body and government are expected to continue examining the revision after the Nov. 11 hearing. The next development to watch is whether lawmakers publish or amend a current draft, clarify the proposed rules for news links and AI training, or announce a schedule for further hearings and a vote.
Until the bill advances and its wording is confirmed, platforms, publishers, creators and AI developers cannot know which obligations will apply or when. The proposal remains under consideration, and no final legal requirements have been established.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the AI copyright bill?
No. It remains under deliberation by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. The Nov. 11 hearing was part of that process, not a final vote.
What would the proposal require platforms to pay for?
Reported drafts would require compensation for activities including aggregating, republishing or displaying news, potentially including link previews. The current wording and payment mechanism have not been confirmed.
What AI issues does the draft address?
Reported provisions cover AI training on copyrighted material, disclosure of AI use, imitation of a creator’s style, and whether AI-assisted works qualify for copyright protection. The current draft’s exact terms remain unclear.
What did the technology companies object to?
Google opposed payments for links and snippets, mandatory centralized licensing and broad training-data licenses, and sought safe-harbor protections. Meta argued that links are not republication and could cost publishers traffic. TikTok said disclosure should not apply when AI only assists content creation.
When could the bill become law?
No vote date or enactment timeline was reported. Parliament and the government are still considering the proposal.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
